WASHINGTON, June 30 (Reuters) – The U.S. economy grew at an annual rate of 2.2 percent in the second quarter, and the U.S. economy expanded at a pace of 2.2 percent. The U.S. economy grew at 2.2% in the second quarter. In the second quarter, the U.S. economy increased by 2.2 percent. Due to the Supreme Court’s decision Thursday, federal authorities have been unable to put in place comprehensive measures to reduce carbon emissions from power plants. Because of this decision, which might have ramifications for other government agencies, President Joe Biden’s climate change programs are in peril.
The Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision to limit EPA regulation of greenhouse gas emissions from coal and gas-fired power plants has significantly curtailed an important anti-pollution act. The administration of Vice President Joe Biden is now working on new regulations.
To restrict the EPA’s capacity to regulate greenhouse carbon emissions from existing power facilities, many states, particularly coal-producing West Virginia, petitioned the Supreme Court to do so. Other contenders were coal businesses and organizations that supported coal use. Coal is a significant source of greenhouse carbon emissions into the environment.
According to Attorney General Patrick Morrisey of West Virginia, it was a “major win” against “federal overreach and the excesses of the administrative state. Congress “did not provide the EPA the power to construct on its own such a regulatory structure,” as Roberts wrote to EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy in his letter.
According to Elena Kagan, Biden’s climate program was choked to death by the Supreme Court. Limits on EPA’s authority, according to Kagan, “fly in the face” of legislation passed by Congress and “deprive EPA of the power required and provided” to cut greenhouse gas emissions.
But Kagan pointed out that the court’s stated purpose is to restrict agencies from doing critical work even if Congress approved it. Vice President Biden’s period in office was supported by Democratic-controlled governments and large utilities, including Consolidated Edison, Exelon, and Pacific Gas & Electric (PCG.O).
It is hoped that by 2035, the US electricity industry will have been decarbonized under Biden’s leadership. The United States is a significant factor in preventing global warming since it is one of the world’s leading greenhouse gas emitters. Thursday marked the conclusion of the court’s nine-month term with the announcement of its judgments.
The EPA lost limited authority to control greenhouse gas emissions.
As a result of the Supreme Court’s momentous ruling, Joe Biden’s climate change programs have suffered greatly. He said it would not impact his efforts to fight climate change.
West Virginia is suing the EPA on behalf of 18 states, most of which are headed by Republicans and the country’s largest coal companies (EPA).
According to them, the whole state was outside of their authority. A significant blow to each state’s economy was expected if the power plants in these 19 states were forced to quit using coal entirely.
Nobody was shocked by the Supreme Court’s ruling that the EPA lacked the jurisdiction to administer such sweeping legislation, as the states and fossil fuel interests had argued.
The Biden EPA’s job-killing requirements were a “major success,” he said in an official statement.
To be clear, Congress must provide specific authorization to the EPA to proceed with rules of this kind in the future. Furthermore, the EPA’s carbon emissions reduction efforts have been repeatedly rebuffed by Congress.
Environmentalists will be alarmed by the verdict since the 19 states who initiated the lawsuit have made little headway in decreasing their greenhouse gas emissions.
States, which emitted 44% of the country’s carbon emissions in 2018, have reduced their emissions by just 7% since 2000.
Vickie Patton, the senior lawyer for the Environmental Defense Fund, said that “today’s Supreme Court ruling threatens the ability of EPA to protect people from climate pollution at a time when overwhelming evidence demonstrates we must act with unprecedented urgency” (EDF).
Read more interesting articles at What News 2 Day